WHEN MONEY CHANGES HANDS, EVEN A WELL-MEANT GESTURE CAN BACKFIRE
Shortly after
ingesting one of the compounded capsules, the child complained of “feeling
funny” and passed out. Her father, a pediatric intensivist at a local
hospital recognized the seriousness of the situation, and immediately took her
to the emergency room of the hospital where he practiced, and ordered a number
of lab tests including a toxic substances screen of both her blood and
urine. The girl was then transferred to the ICU where she was supported
with pressors, fluids, and a respirator. To everyone’s shock, both
screens came back positive for near-lethal levels clonidine, a
commonly-prescribed medication for hypertension and a variety of other
disorders. The child recovered over a period of a week and was discharged
without sequelae. The balance of her prescription was sent to a forensic
laboratory for assay. Not surprisingly, all the capsules that were part
of her prescription contained a combination of chloroquine phosphate and
clonidine. The pharmacy that compounded the prescription did likewise
with the two bottles they had obtained from the second pharmacy. The bottle
that was marked with the “X” (the one that was used to compound the
prescription) was actually a mixture of chloroquine phosphate and
clonidine. The sealed bottle that was NOT used actually contained pure
clonidine. The most likely explanation was that the second pharmacy
purchased two mislabeled bottles of chloroquine phosphate from its supplier,
used one of them in its own compounding (interestingly, there were no reports
of accidental clonidine poisonings associated with THAT pharmacy), and re-adulterated
the bottle with its own chloroquine phosphate.
The father sued the first pharmacy as well as the manufacturer of the purported chloroquine phosphate powder. Surprisingly, the judge dismissed the case against that pharmacy because he felt that even though the prescription was incorrectly filled, it was through no fault of theirs. The manufacturer of the purported chloroquine phosphate had a long history of problems with the FDA and made a substantial settlement with the father. When discovery revealed that the product used to compound the prescription actually originated from another pharmacy rather than from a licensed wholesaler or manufacturer, the second pharmacy was added to the suit. That pharmacy owner also settled with the father in order to avoid a trial.
Takeaway Points
Pharmacists should
always remember that it is permissible, even laudable, for one pharmacist to
come to the aid of another by lending a needed product when time is of
the essence. Unfortunately, this is not what happened. Even though
I’m sure the owner of the second pharmacy meant well, by selling the
drug to the first pharmacy, even at his cost, he became a de facto
wholesaler, and an unlicensed one at that. The fact that he sold an open
container made the situation that much worse. Pharmacists must be
cognizant of where they fit in the supply chain at all times.
Comments
Post a Comment